2012 Maryland Legislative Update

Friday, April 27th, 2012

Yesterday, the Howard County Association of Realtors held their 2012 Legislative Update at the Slayton House.  Many local officials were on hand to answer some tough questions.  A special session is eminent with the many unresolved issues.  Those issues include the Mortgage Interest Deduction,  Tax on Property Management Services,  Real Estate Brokerage Reform,  Real Estate Agency Legislation and more.

Below please find the outstanding issues provided by the Maryland Association on Realtors. Highlighted links provide details on each Bill and actions by both House and Senate.

 

 

 

 

2012 Legislative Priorities

 

Mortgage Interest Deduction

MAR opposed any reduction in the mortgage interest deduction (MID).  Under the Governor’s Budget Reconciliation Bill, itemized deductions would have been reduced by 10-20 percent for tax filers with an adjusted gross income exceeding $100,000.  The mortgage interest deduction and the deductibility of state and local property taxes account for almost 70% of the itemized tax deductions taken by Maryland filers.

 

STATUS: Itemized deductions, including MID and property taxes, were not changed in the budget reconciliation bill. However, because the Legislature adjourned without passing a revenue measure for the budget, it is likely that a special session will be called before July 1st to complete action on a revenue bill.  While unlikely, it is possible that the proposal to reduce deductions could be revived.

 

Tax on Property Management Services

Legislation was introduced to place a sales tax on property management and a number of other services.  MAR opposed this legislation.

 

STATUS: This legislation did not pass.

 

Real Estate Brokerage Reform

Legislation making far reaching changes to real estate practice in Maryland was also considered this year.  The legislation would have eliminated exclusive right to sell contracts in Maryland (the basis for the MLS), and would have limited brokerage agreements to 90 days, among other provisions.  MAR opposed this legislation.

STATUS: This legislation did not pass.

 

Real Estate Agency Legislation

Legislation was introduced to clarify and redefine some of the agency categories now used in Maryland, and change some of the disclosure language in the agency disclosure form.  MAR did not support this legislation.

 

STATUS: This legislation did not pass.

 

Sustainable Growth

The Governor proposed legislation to restrict new subdivision development on septic systems throughout Maryland.  The legislation would have given the Maryland Department of Environment (MDE) and the Maryland Department of Planning (MDP) authority to approve creation of zoning overlays where septic subdivisions could and could not be developed.  Although it became clear that there were not enough votes to defeat the bill, MAR joined a coalition of concerned groups to remove state approval for the local growth tiers.

 

STATUS: State approval authority was removed from the bill.  As passed, the legislation will require local governments to define and develop growth tiers that will direct where major subdivisions using septic systems may be located.

 

Septic System Grants and Bay Restoration Fund

Under the Bay Restoration Fund, MDE provides 100% cost-differential grants for homeowners with failing systems living in Maryland’s Critical Area.  The grants cover the cost of Best Available Technology (BAT) systems that have enhanced nitrogen removal technology.  Authority for the 100% grants terminates at the end of 2012, and MAR sought legislation to continue the grant program with a more generous grant formula than MDE now provides.  In addition, legislation was introduced to increase the Bay Fund fees.  MAR opposed a consumption based fee, and preferred the recommendation of the Task Force to simply double the fee.

 

STATUS: Mandatory septic grant legislation did not pass.  The Bay Restoration Fee was doubled from $30 a year to $60 a year (without a consumption based formula).

 

PlanMaryland

The Maryland Department of Planning (MDP) submitted a statewide development plan called PlanMaryland before the Legislature convened in January.  MAR had submitted two comment letters expressing concern that PlanMaryland could override local planning decisions by allowing the state to deny permits and funding to local development projects.   Other groups, including the Maryland Association of Counties (MACO), shared those concerns.

 

STATUS:  MAR supported a MACO drafted bill to clarify that PlanMaryland cannot be used to deny permits and statutorily required funding to local governments.  The legislation passed.

 

Stormwater Management Fee

Legislation was introduced to require local county governments to impose a stormwater management fee on all residential and commercial property.  MAR opposed the bill, because counties already have authority to impose stormwater fees, and because many counties were already considering such actions given stormwater requirements imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency.

 

STATUS: Legislation passed requiring the ten Maryland counties subject to EPA stormwater requirements to impose a stormwater fee.  The legislation gives local government discretion in creating the fee.

 

Real Estate Commission Regulatory Authority

Every ten years, the Real Estate Commission’s (REC) operations are reviewed and a written report is issued.  The report is the basis for legislation which extends the REC’s regulatory authority.  Without passage, the REC would no longer be able to function and issue real estate licenses.  MAR supported reauthorization of the Real Estate Commission, but requested that the guarantee fund cap remain at $25,000.

 

STATUS: The REC’s reauthorization passed with an increase in the guarantee fund cap to $50,000.  The Legislature increased the cap because it has been over 20 years since any change was made.

 

Real Estate Commission Continuing Education

The Real Estate Commission requested legislation to allow legal and legislative update classes more flexibility in the material presented to licensees, including court cases and legal trends.  MAR supported the bill, which also allows electronic transmission of continuing education class certificates.

 

STATUS: This legislation passed.

 

Lead Paint

Just before the Legislature convened, the Maryland Court of Appeals overturned the property owner liability protections in the Reduction of Lead Risk in Housing law.  As a result, property owners and property managers were subject to uncapped liability for any injuries resulting from elevated blood lead levels.  Numerous bills were introduced to address this problem.  In addition, a Lead Work Group met over the summer to examine whether sellers of owner-occupied housing should be required to conduct lead dust tests.  Although the work group did not recommend point of sale dust tests for owner-occupied property, legislation was introduced which would have required such tests.

 

STATUS: Legislation passed creating liability protections for property owners; increasing the registration fees from $15-$30 for rental properties; requiring 1950-1978 rental properties to participate in the Lead Poisoning Prevention Program (by 2015); and giving MDE authority to mandate clearance tests for any properties subject to the EPA Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) Rule.  Mandatory dust tests for owner occupied property sales did not pass.

 

Homestead Tax Disclosure Real Estate

Legislation was introduced that required real estate agents and brokers to disclose the Homestead Tax Credit to homebuyers for each property subject to the credit.  The legislation also included a penalty for property owners who wrongly claimed the credit.

 

STATUS:  Legislation passed with a penalty for homeowners who willfully misrepresent facts in order to claim the credit.  The legislation does not require real estate agents to disclose the credit.

 

Foreclosures

A Task Force met last summer to discuss several issues related to foreclosures, including changes to the mediation program, property registration, and the creation of a safe harbor for licensed real estate agents who assist clients applying for short sale approvals.  Legislation was introduced to require only mediation changes and the property registry.

 

STATUS: Legislation passed that creates a process to allow pre-foreclosure mediation, and a statewide registry of foreclosed properties.

 

Ground Rents

The Maryland Court of Appeals also ruled that a state law penalizing ground rent owners was unconstitutional.  That law required ground rent owners to register the ground rent with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT) or forfeit fee simple title.  The Legislature considered legislation to create a more appropriate penalty for failing to register a ground rent with SDAT.

 

STATUS: Legislation passed that penalizes ground rent owners who fail to register a ground rent by prohibiting them from filing a lien or collecting rent.

 

Interest Rate on Security Deposits

Currently, property owners are required to return a security deposit to a tenant with at least a 3% annual interest rate.  Unfortunately, most savings and checking accounts are well below 3% and have been for a long time.  MAR supported legislation to require a security deposit to be returned to a tenant with the higher of a 1.5% flat rate, or a rate comparable to the U.S. Treasury Daily Yield Curve Rate as measured by the first of the year.

 

STATUS: This legislation did not pass.

What is the status of ground rents in Maryland now?

Tuesday, January 17th, 2012

What is the status of ground rents in Maryland now? The Court in Muskin v. State Department of Assessment and Taxation recently overturned a key part of the law which extinguished unregistered ground rents. Under the Ground Rent Act of 2007, ground rent leaseholders were given three years to register ground rents with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT) or the ground rent would be subject to being extinguished by statute. Of course there was a challenge to this law. The recent ruling by the Court said this extinguishment by statute was an unconstitutional taking of property. What does this ruling mean for realtors, lenders, and title companies? Any Certificate of Extinguishment issued by the SDAT is void and has no effect. The ruling did leave the requirement to register ground rents in tact, but unfortunately there is no penalty for failing to do so. This means that realtors must be careful to make sure and clarify at the time of listing of a property if the property is really the subject of a ground rent. It also means that lenders and title companies will continue to require proof of ground rent payment and many times require escrows for ground rents. You may visit the SDAT website at the link to follow for more information about ground rent registration or redemption: http://www.dat.state.md.us/sdatweb/Register_groundrent.html. Please feel free to contact any of the attorneys at Lakeside Title Company when you have questions about ground rents. We are happy to try to assist you. #410-992-1070

ASK THE EXPERT- Enhanced vs. Basic Title Insurance

Thursday, December 15th, 2011

I am purchasing a new home and don’t understand why I would want to pay extra for enhanced title insurance?  Can you help explain?

Yes, the answer is simple.  The “enhanced” policy (also referred to as “gold”, “eagle”, and  “advantage”) offers essential additional coverage not found in a standard owner’s policy.  The enhanced policy (ALTA Homeowner’s Policy) includes additional coverage for an improved residential property including some post -settlement/post-policy events.

To highlight a few:

-Someone claiming rights to your property arising from forgery or impersonation even post policy.

-Policy will insure you forever during your ownership and also insures anyone who inherits your property upon death and the trustee of a trust to whom you transfer title after policy issued.

-Includes built in inflation protection—the policy amount will increase by ten percent each year for the first five years up to 150% of the original policy amount.

-Protects owner from loss due to encroachments of their building structure (other than boundary walls and fences) over property lines and against loss due to encroachments of neighbors’ building structure (other than boundary walls or fences) built post-policy and without your consent.

These are just a few examples of enhanced coverage; for a more comprehensive list please see (link) to our website “What does title insurance cover? Basic vs. Enhanced Compare the Coverage”.

Please note, the usual and customary title search will be conducted;   accordingly, an adverse matter discovered may be noted on title commitment and included in final title policy as an exception. I encourage purchasers to review and ask questions regarding their proposed title policy.  The underwriting attorneys and marketing representatives at Lakeside Title Company are always willing to answer your questions.

Understand BRAC and Increase Your Bottom Line!

Wednesday, July 20th, 2011

Please find the link to Raj Kudchadkar’s BRAC presentation below:

CLICK HERE

Scam Alert ***

Friday, July 15th, 2011

Lakeside Title Co. and Deardorff & Moon, LLC want to notify all of our clients and partners of a recent up tick of  fraud relating to “potential purchasers”  sending cashier’s checks  to third party title companies or attorneys.  The scam starts with an email to an agent expressing interest in a listing; and also requesting a  recommendation for an attorney to hold the deposit.  The “Interested Buyer” only communicates via email, is  located out of the country usually, intends to pay cash, and is not available by telephone during normal business hours. The goal of the scam is to deposit the entire purchase price (fraudulent cashier’s check) with third party, cancel contract, then request funds to be wired back.  Below are some  links to which provide sufficient proof this common scenario is most likely a scam.  We recommend that agents do a simple online GOOGLE on their prospective buyers so they can verify they are working with legitimate clients.  Also provided is a link to report this fraud to the FBI.

http://www.sarasotahomesforsalenow.com/sarasota-real-estate-scam/

You will see that the scam was reported by a general counsel for a Remax in the NW region and all of these sites report similar scams :

http://www.trulia.com/profile/paulettejonesrealtor/qanda/ , https://point2.zendesk.com/entries/218728-real-estate-scam-using-pt-2-to-find-agents , http://activerain.com/blogsview/1930492/scammers-or-legitimate-buyers- and at http://activerain.com/blogsview/1770880/scam-to-buy-expensive-home-from-masaaski-sasamoto

FTC Issues Rules Affecting Short Sale Practitioners

Thursday, June 9th, 2011

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently issued new rules that may impact real estate practitioners representing short sale clients involved in short sale transactions.  Depending on certain factors, the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services (MARS) rules could require disclosures to consumers when negotiating a short sale with a lender or advertising short sales experience.  The rules were issued to protect homeowners from mortgage relief scams that continue to spring up during the mortgage crisis.  The most significant rule under the FTC’s new rule is the advance fee ban.  Under this provision, mortgage relief companies may not collect ANY fees until they have provided consumers with a written offer from their lender or servicer that the consumer decides is acceptable and a written document from the lender or servicer describing the key changes to the mortgage that would result if the consumer accepts the offer.  The companies must also remind the consumer of their right to reject the offer without any charge.

Attorneys are generally exempt from the FTC rule if they meet three conditions:  1) they are engaged in the practice of law, 2) they are licensed in the state where the consumer or dwelling is located, and 3) they are complying with state laws and regulations governing attorney conduct related to the rule.  To be exempt from the advance fee ban, attorney must meet a fourth requirement – they must place any fees they collect in a client trust account and abide by state laws and regulations governing such accounts.

The attorneys at Deardorff & Moon, LLC, the law firm supporting Lakeside Title Company, never charge any upfront fees when negotiating short sales and the initial 30 minute consultation is also free of charge.  To schedule a free 30 minute consultation with one of the Deardorff & Moon, LLC attorneys, please call 410-992-1070 and ask for Sarah Couey or Jamie Bauguess who are both responsible for scheduling the free consultations.

Lakeside Title Company in the Community…

Friday, June 3rd, 2011

Lakeside Title Company in the Community….Lakeside continues to support non-profits in the community.  Meg Moon, staff attorney overseeing commercial accounts, will be participating as a bowler in the Fifth Annual HOPE BOWL to benefit the Domestic Violence Center.  The event is on June 18, 2011, 7-9 at Brunswick Columbia Lanes.  For more information , check the bowl section at dvcenter.org.

Maryland Emergency Mortgage Assistance Program (EMA)

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

Information provided by Vickie Gipson, Esquire – the director St. Ambrose Housing Aid Center.

I am actively engaged in getting the word out about Maryland’s Emergency Mortgage Assistance (EMA) Program.  This program is designed to meet the needs of homeowners facing foreclosure due to involuntary unemployment, underemployment or who have experienced a loss of income due to medical condition.  A homeowner may receive up to $50,000.00 in either arrearage or forward payments or both.  The borrower must be at least 3 months behind and less than 12 months in the arrears.  The arrears will be paid and going forward payments toward the mortgage can last for up to two years not to exceed $50,000.00.  The borrower’s income must fall within 120% of HUD Area Median Income FY 2010 Limits and the only real estate that they can own is their principal residence.  The loan is interest free and, if certain conditions are met (i.e., the borrower resumes making the full mortgage payments), the loan will be extinguished by the end of the fifth year that the borrower resumes making his or her full and timely mortgage payments.   Please share this information with your client’s as it is a quick way to save their properties from foreclosure.  As a prime partner for this program we are accepting applications for submission to DHCD.  This program, at least at our agency, has not had the overwhelming response that we had anticipated.  The good news for your clients is that funding is still available.  The bad news is that this is still time sensitive and time limited program.  For those of you affiliated with groups interested in learning more about the program, I am available to come meet with your organization.  Please let me know how we can work together to get the word out about this fantastic program. Please feel free to contact me at the numbers below or have your clients contact our EMA HOTLINE to apply for this program 410-366-6091.

Vote For the Baby Eaglets

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

This heartwarming story is shared by Sharon Femrite in Lakeside Title’s Post Closing Department

In 2003, two American bald eagles set up residency at the Norfolk Botanical Gardens in Norfolk, Virginia.  These eagles quickly became celebrities.  An eagle cam caught all the action at the nest. (http://www.wvec.com/marketplace/microsite-content/eagle-cam.html) Moderators volunteered their time to answer questions and thousands of people from around the world followed every event.   The first of three eggs was laid Feb. 3.  Mom and Dad were the best.  Fifteen eaglets and several clutches of three.  Dad is the primary supplier of food for baby eaglets but on the morning of April 26, Mom had joined in the search and with a fish clutched in her talons, she and Dad were returning to the nest and she collided with an airplane and was killed.  It was quickly determined that the three eaglets would probably not survive with only one parent to care for them.  The three eaglets were taken from the nest and transported to the Wildlife Center of Virginia in Waynesboro, Virginia.  This is a NON-profit rehabilitation center.  They care for over 2,000 animals a year.  WCV, within days, had a nest built, a cam for the thousands of grieving viewers and the moderators were back with their continuing support.  With this background, here is what I am asking you to do:  GO TO YOUR FACEBOOK PAGE AND VOTE –  Chase Community Giving has established a fund for non-profit groups and they determine who they will give money to based upon viewer voting.  Several weeks ago the preliminary voting was done and WCV received $25,000.  Now the jackpot is $500,000!!!! TO VOTE Go to Facebook and LIKE the Chase Community Giving page, www.facebook.com/ChaseCommunityGiving go to “find Charities” click on Wildlife Center of Virginia and hit vote. Voting is between May 19 to May 25.

In the late 1960’s there were 32 breeding pairs of bald eagles in Virginia.  Today, there are nearly 700 pairs.  The WCV is doing everything possible to make sure these three eaglets will be released to the wild in August.  With your vote, you can help a wonderful organization continue and improve their contribution to our world.  If you know of someone else who can cast a vote for the Wildlife Center of Virginia, please forward this e-mail on to them.  Many, many thanks, Sharon

Are IDOTS taxable?

Monday, May 23rd, 2011

An IDOT (Indemnity Deed of Trust) is granted by someone other than the borrower (usually a Guarantor) who is not primarily liable on the Note  but  granted to secure the Grantors collateral interest and secondary liability.   Borrowers and lenders in Maryland have long been using IDOTs  as a means of securing a loan with real estate without payment of recordation taxes. The Maryland  code provides an exemption from the tax based on the theory that the Grantor/Guarantor has not incurred  a debt  at  time of recording of  instrument; rather the  debt is contingent and may or may not become due.  Are IDOTs still exempt?  The answer: YES,  if properly drafted.  There still exists an exemption under the Tax Property Article; however, the clerks are carefully examining commercial transactions and reviewing the language in the loan documents including the IDOT, guaranty, settlement sheet, and loan agreements.  It is not enough to have the instrument titled “Indemnity Deed of Trust” or “Guaranty Mortgage/Deed of Trust”.  If  the documents are worded in a way which obligates the Grantor under the Note, the instrument will not qualify for tax deferral and the clerk will impose recordation taxes at time of recording.  The distinction between a qualifying IDOT and one that does not qualify may be subtle, and we are carefully  looking at our commercial transactions prior to settlement to best advise our clients.  We will continue to pass on any new information from the clerks or the Office of Attorney General which may impact you or your clients.

Meg Moon, Esquire

Lakeside Title Company

Affiliated Law Firm- Deardorff & Moon, LLC.

close

Success! Your message has been sent. We will be in touch soon.

success!