Scam Alert ***

Friday, July 15th, 2011

Lakeside Title Co. and Deardorff & Moon, LLC want to notify all of our clients and partners of a recent up tick of  fraud relating to “potential purchasers”  sending cashier’s checks  to third party title companies or attorneys.  The scam starts with an email to an agent expressing interest in a listing; and also requesting a  recommendation for an attorney to hold the deposit.  The “Interested Buyer” only communicates via email, is  located out of the country usually, intends to pay cash, and is not available by telephone during normal business hours. The goal of the scam is to deposit the entire purchase price (fraudulent cashier’s check) with third party, cancel contract, then request funds to be wired back.  Below are some  links to which provide sufficient proof this common scenario is most likely a scam.  We recommend that agents do a simple online GOOGLE on their prospective buyers so they can verify they are working with legitimate clients.  Also provided is a link to report this fraud to the FBI.

http://www.sarasotahomesforsalenow.com/sarasota-real-estate-scam/

You will see that the scam was reported by a general counsel for a Remax in the NW region and all of these sites report similar scams :

http://www.trulia.com/profile/paulettejonesrealtor/qanda/ , https://point2.zendesk.com/entries/218728-real-estate-scam-using-pt-2-to-find-agents , http://activerain.com/blogsview/1930492/scammers-or-legitimate-buyers- and at http://activerain.com/blogsview/1770880/scam-to-buy-expensive-home-from-masaaski-sasamoto

FTC Issues Rules Affecting Short Sale Practitioners

Thursday, June 9th, 2011

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently issued new rules that may impact real estate practitioners representing short sale clients involved in short sale transactions.  Depending on certain factors, the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services (MARS) rules could require disclosures to consumers when negotiating a short sale with a lender or advertising short sales experience.  The rules were issued to protect homeowners from mortgage relief scams that continue to spring up during the mortgage crisis.  The most significant rule under the FTC’s new rule is the advance fee ban.  Under this provision, mortgage relief companies may not collect ANY fees until they have provided consumers with a written offer from their lender or servicer that the consumer decides is acceptable and a written document from the lender or servicer describing the key changes to the mortgage that would result if the consumer accepts the offer.  The companies must also remind the consumer of their right to reject the offer without any charge.

Attorneys are generally exempt from the FTC rule if they meet three conditions:  1) they are engaged in the practice of law, 2) they are licensed in the state where the consumer or dwelling is located, and 3) they are complying with state laws and regulations governing attorney conduct related to the rule.  To be exempt from the advance fee ban, attorney must meet a fourth requirement – they must place any fees they collect in a client trust account and abide by state laws and regulations governing such accounts.

The attorneys at Deardorff & Moon, LLC, the law firm supporting Lakeside Title Company, never charge any upfront fees when negotiating short sales and the initial 30 minute consultation is also free of charge.  To schedule a free 30 minute consultation with one of the Deardorff & Moon, LLC attorneys, please call 410-992-1070 and ask for Sarah Couey or Jamie Bauguess who are both responsible for scheduling the free consultations.

Are IDOTS taxable?

Monday, May 23rd, 2011

An IDOT (Indemnity Deed of Trust) is granted by someone other than the borrower (usually a Guarantor) who is not primarily liable on the Note  but  granted to secure the Grantors collateral interest and secondary liability.   Borrowers and lenders in Maryland have long been using IDOTs  as a means of securing a loan with real estate without payment of recordation taxes. The Maryland  code provides an exemption from the tax based on the theory that the Grantor/Guarantor has not incurred  a debt  at  time of recording of  instrument; rather the  debt is contingent and may or may not become due.  Are IDOTs still exempt?  The answer: YES,  if properly drafted.  There still exists an exemption under the Tax Property Article; however, the clerks are carefully examining commercial transactions and reviewing the language in the loan documents including the IDOT, guaranty, settlement sheet, and loan agreements.  It is not enough to have the instrument titled “Indemnity Deed of Trust” or “Guaranty Mortgage/Deed of Trust”.  If  the documents are worded in a way which obligates the Grantor under the Note, the instrument will not qualify for tax deferral and the clerk will impose recordation taxes at time of recording.  The distinction between a qualifying IDOT and one that does not qualify may be subtle, and we are carefully  looking at our commercial transactions prior to settlement to best advise our clients.  We will continue to pass on any new information from the clerks or the Office of Attorney General which may impact you or your clients.

Meg Moon, Esquire

Lakeside Title Company

Affiliated Law Firm- Deardorff & Moon, LLC.

close

Success! Your message has been sent. We will be in touch soon.

success!